Today Apple released iMovie 10.1.10 for macOS and iMovie 2.2.6 for iOS. This gives us a clue that there will be a Final Cut Pro X update soon.
As I discovered in 2013, iMovie for macOS and Final Cut Pro X are the same core application with variations for a starter editor user interface and an experienced editor user interface. This means that iMovie and Final Cut Pro X updates usually happen within days of each other. Bugs fixed in the the core that they share mean that if they are fixed in iMovie, they are fixed in Final Cut Pro X.
- Removes the option to share video files directly to Facebook
- Adds a new Prepare for Facebook option which exports a Facebook-compatible video file to your system, which you can manually upload to the Facebook website
- Improves overall stability
Final Cut Pro X is often updated on the same day as iMovie. If an update is coming it is likely that Apple are delaying the release until Friday of next week. That is the day the Video Applications team is hosting a presentation at the Town Hall room in the 1 Infinite Loop building in Cupertino. The presentation is part of the 2018 FCPX Creative Summit.
I wish I could be there.
The question is whether the update will be a point release to version 10.4.4 or a big release to version 10.5. 10.3 was released at the 2016 FCPX Creative Summit and 10.4 was released at the 2017 FCPX Creative Summit. Also remember that just because the version number might not increase, the features introduced in point release could be very useful. Even if the feature list is short in a point release, you never know if changes to the application that aren’t reflected in new user features could be paving the way for third-party tools to make the Final Cut ecosystem even better.
It’s just a version number. Earlier this year saw a big point release when 10.4.1 introduced some big features: Closed captions, enhanced export and ProRes RAW.
We will find out in 10 days!Read more
A common observation of how a new technology is received by the establishment over time:
Adobe have introduced a rudimentary element of the Final Cut Pro X magnetic timeline to their NLEs in the form of Adobe Premiere Rush CC – their new cross-platform online video editing application. Maybe the Adobe position on trackless video editing goes like this:
On the other hand, what if trackless video editing might be more of a ‘Jet Pack’ than a ‘Powered Human Fight’?
In a post on how to assess the potential of a proposed technology, Benedict Evans compared powered human flight in 1903 with jet packs in 1960.
Both technologies were pretty limited. The Wright brothers managed to fly one person for a few hundred metres. Jet packs could fly a single person for 21 seconds. Today air travel and transport has transformed the world. Jet packs can now fly for 30 seconds.
How could you tell which product had a future?
The question, then, is not whether something works now but whether it could work – whether you know how to change it. Saying ‘it doesn’t work, today’ has no value, but saying ‘yes, but everything didn’t work once’ also has no value. Rather, do you have a roadmap? Do you know what to do next?
- The Wright Flyer looked like a toy but was in fact a breakthrough in flight with a clear roadmap that was easy to follow for it to become something huge almost immediately. Then we needed another breakthrough, around jets, to get to cheap mass air travel in the second half of the century.
- Mobile phones in 1947 had no roadmap to become a mass-market product, but mobile phones in 1975 or 1980 absolutely had such a roadmap, with a path to make them cheap and universal.
- Rocket packs have remained a toy and we have never had any roadmap for making them anything more.
In his post Benedict comes up with some ways to judge whether new technologies have a future. Ways that you can apply to the question ‘Does trackless Final Cut Pro X has more of a future than track-based Adobe Premiere Pro CC?’
At least Apple’s iMovie and Final Cut Pro X finally have some real competition in Adobe Premiere Rush CC. The closest thing to an application that will put some fire under the Apple Video Applications team.Read more
If you are tempted to apply very new macOS updates, it is a good idea to have ‘last known good’ macOS installers to hand. They also help when you need to recover from serious Mac problems.
Even though there is a new version of macOS available, the High Sierra installer is still available from the Mac App Store.
Blackmagic Design have announced their new RAW codec family at IBC today. Possible interpretations of the press release:
Blackmagic RAW has been in development for years
We started on this long before we heard Apple was developing a post-focused RAW codec.
Blackmagic RAW…moves part of the de-mosaic process into the camera where it can be hardware accelerated by the camera itself
There is no margin in giving away free post software. We are a post production hardware company that makes cameras, not a computer maker.
Because the processor intensive partial de-mosaic is done by the camera hardware, software such as DaVinci Resolve doesn’t have to do as much work decoding the files
We want our software to be cross-platform. We need to make sure Resolve works on operating systems and hardware that might not be as good at working with media. Popular hardware and OS combinations aren’t powerful enough to work with ProRes RAW
Blackmagic RAW is much more than a simple RAW container format. Its intelligent design actually understands the camera and the sensor. This means the image data, along with the unique characteristics of the image sensor
Despite cameras not having huge differences in sensor and glass, we think Apple ProRes RAW doesn’t include enough metadata to capture their individual characteristics.
Blackmagic Design is up against one of the biggest brands in post production. As much as people say “Can I look at it on the Avid,” they also say “Can you send me a ProRes.” It makes post-production adjacent people in TV and film feel like they are ‘in with’ the post process – even if those brands are all they know. They would be happy if you showed them you work on a Adobe Premiere Pro CC timeline, or if you send them an H.265 MP4.
I’ll be interested to see if Blackmagic gets people switching from Apple and Avid codecs for post. I’m looking forward to seeing how well ProRes RAW converts to Blackmagic RAW.
According to fcp.co, the Blackmagic’s beta codec and sample media don’t work in Final Cut Pro X, but there’s no business reason why they shouldn’t. If Final Cut users liked it, Blackmagic could sell more cameras.
As regards Apple’s ProRes RAW working in Resolve, I’m sure they would like that, but they also like other applications being used as off-line editors while the online -the last 5% – is done in Resolve (if needed).
Overall: A reaction, not an instigation.Read more
With the growing adoption of the Interoperable Master Format for content exchange it has become increasingly important for professional editing solutions to support this standard. Marquise Technologies and Adobe have collaborated to enable Adobe Premiere Pro CC to import IMF packages, including multiple CPLs packages. Editors are now able to review and process IMF Application #2 and #2e (Studio Profile) content.
Should Apple make an external display for Macs? One with a built-in GPU? How about the 2018 iPad Pros?
Apple’s September 2018 iPhone launch event didn’t mention the iPad Pro range. What might the future hold? The Apple rumour industry predicts a new look – inspired by the iPhone: smaller bezels, antenna lines around the edge. The iPad Smart connector may move to a different edge and the home button is removed to allow for Face ID to replace Touch ID.
If Apple start promoting another use for iPad Pros – as Pro accessories for Macs – then the iPad update may come in an event also promoting new Macs.
Many Mac users also have iPads. What if new iPads could improve Macs? My wish: that new iPads can act as external screens and eGPUs for Macs. This would be useful for MacBook Pro users who need more screen space and more power when on the move. The iPad Pro has a 2732 by 2048 pixel wide colour display. Its GPU can update the display 120 times a second. That graphics power could be useful for high-end applications.
Mac minis with a Thunderbolt 3-powered USB C connectors could get extra processing power and a display. For those who would like to manage multiple Mac minis, having a handy external screen to move from device to device would be very useful.
As many professional applications make extensive use of GPU processing, any help they can get from adjacent devices would be useful. I don’t know if the Lightning port on iOS devices can connect at Thunderbolt 3 bandwidth. Maybe the iPad Pro Smart Connector can.
Some professional applications could even add features that work on connected touchscreens like iPads and iPhones. For example a Lumberjack System-like keyword palette might be use for Final Cut Pro X.
If Apple did this, it would be very likely that I would seriously consider replacing my current iPad 2 with a new iPad Pro!